Mathias STRASSER
b7dc27f2a5
Les enseignants ont besoin de moyennes à jour immédiatement après la publication ou modification des notes, sans attendre un batch nocturne. Le système recalcule via Domain Events synchrones : statistiques d'évaluation (min/max/moyenne/médiane), moyennes matières pondérées (normalisation /20), et moyenne générale par élève. Les résultats sont stockés dans des tables dénormalisées avec cache Redis (TTL 5 min). Trois endpoints API exposent les données avec contrôle d'accès par rôle. Une commande console permet le backfill des données historiques au déploiement.
117 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
117 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
validationDate: 2026-01-27
|
|
workflowName: testarch-atdd
|
|
workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/bmad-testarch-atdd
|
|
validationStatus: COMPLETE
|
|
completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Validation Report: testarch-atdd
|
|
|
|
**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 10:24:01
|
|
**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
|
|
**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
|
|
|
|
## File Structure & Size
|
|
|
|
- workflow.md present: YES
|
|
- instructions.md present: YES
|
|
- workflow.yaml present: YES
|
|
- step files found: 8
|
|
|
|
**Step File Sizes:**
|
|
|
|
- steps-c/step-01-preflight-and-context.md: 100 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-02-generation-mode.md: 70 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-03-test-strategy.md: 69 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-04-generate-tests.md: 69 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-05-validate-and-complete.md: 60 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- workflow-plan.md present: YES
|
|
|
|
## Frontmatter Validation
|
|
|
|
- No frontmatter violations found
|
|
|
|
## Critical Path Violations
|
|
|
|
### Config Variables (Exceptions)
|
|
|
|
Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name
|
|
|
|
- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
|
|
|
|
- No dead relative links detected
|
|
|
|
- No module path assumptions detected
|
|
|
|
**Status:** ✅ PASS - No critical violations
|
|
|
|
## Menu Handling Validation
|
|
|
|
- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
|
|
|
|
## Step Type Validation
|
|
|
|
- steps-c/step-01-preflight-and-context.md: Init [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-02-generation-mode.md: Middle [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-03-test-strategy.md: Middle [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-04-generate-tests.md: Middle [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-05-validate-and-complete.md: Final [PASS]
|
|
- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
|
|
|
|
## Output Format Validation
|
|
|
|
- Templates present: atdd-checklist-template.md
|
|
- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
|
|
- steps-c/step-04-generate-tests.md
|
|
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md
|
|
- checklist.md present: YES
|
|
|
|
## Validation Design Check
|
|
|
|
- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
|
|
- Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
|
|
- Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed
|
|
|
|
## Instruction Style Check
|
|
|
|
- Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
|
|
- Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance
|
|
|
|
## Collaborative Experience Check
|
|
|
|
- Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
|
|
- Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
|
|
- Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals
|
|
|
|
## Subagent Optimization Opportunities
|
|
|
|
- No high-priority subagent optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
|
|
- Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
|
|
- Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
|
|
- Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
|
|
- Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only
|
|
|
|
## Cohesive Review
|
|
|
|
- Overall assessment: GOOD
|
|
- Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
|
|
- Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
|
|
- Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)
|
|
|
|
## Plan Quality Validation
|
|
|
|
- Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
|
|
- Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
|
|
- Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
|
|
- Critical issues: 0
|
|
- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
|
|
- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)
|